|
|
|||||||
| Brainstorming Ideas | L |
M |
H |
Weighted Total Score |
N | Average | Lead Person(s) - Volunteer(s) |
|
|
|||||||
| Identify best practices | 1 | 8 | 12 | 53 | 21 | 2.52 | |
| Develop project plan for XML registry | 3 | 6 | 12 | 51 | 21 | 2.43 | |
| Renew charter & include GAO recommendations as roles | 2 | 9 | 10 | 50 | 21 | 2.38 | |
| Create strategy for governmentwide adoption of XML | 4 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 21 | 2.38 | |
| XML for long-term preservation of records | 3 | 7 | 11 | 50 | 21 | 2.38 | |
| Training opportunities, including free, Web-based | 2 | 9 | 10 | 50 | 21 | 2.38 | |
| Identify process for tracking/sharing standards efforts | 2 | 7 | 11 | 49 | 20 | 2.45 | |
| Participate with voluntary consensus standards bodies | 2 | 5 | 12 | 48 | 19 | 2.53 | |
| Leverage existing Federal/agency data standards | 1 | 10 | 9 | 48 | 20 | 2.40 | |
| Define procedures for XML registry | 3 | 9 | 9 | 48 | 21 | 2.29 | |
| Demonstrate registry interopability w/State/local/private | 4 | 7 | 10 | 48 | 21 | 2.29 | |
|
|
|||||||
| Agency pilots (include B2G & C2G) | 0 | 10 | 9 | 47 | 19 | 2.47 | |
| Standard XML implementation guidance | 3 | 7 | 10 | 47 | 20 | 2.35 | |
| Determine how XML WG can add value | 4 | 6 | 10 | 46 | 20 | 2.30 | |
| Subgroup to draft policy | 2 | 11 | 7 | 45 | 20 | 2.25 | |
| Verbiage for inclusion in contracts | 4 | 10 | 7 | 45 | 21 | 2.14 | |
| Map standards to FEAF & ensure government involvement | 1 | 8 | 9 | 44 | 18 | 2.44 | |
| Review & incorporate commercial & gov standards | 2 | 12 | 6 | 44 | 20 | 2.20 | |
| Procedures for distributed content management | 6 | 4 | 10 | 44 | 20 | 2.20 | |
| Input to governmentwide strategy for interoperability | 3 | 8 | 8 | 43 | 19 | 2.26 | |
| Case studies for business processes beyond data exchange | 2 | 13 | 5 | 43 | 20 | 2.15 | |
| Metadata standard for government | 5 | 5 | 9 | 42 | 19 | 2.21 | |
| Business plan for operation/management of registry | 5 | 8 | 7 | 42 | 20 | 2.10 | |
| Establish registry for templates (cross-agency work) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 42 | 20 | 2.10 | |
| Web Services subgroup | 3 | 12 | 5 | 42 | 20 | 2.10 | |
| Interagency security subgroup (PKI, GSA, NIST) | 3 | 7 | 8 | 41 | 18 | 2.28 | |
| Communication/outreach focused on 4 eGov initiatives | 2 | 18 | 1 | 41 | 21 | 1.95 | |
| Establish library of use cases | 7 | 8 | 6 | 41 | 21 | 1.95 | |
| Tie together agency & OMB strategies | 3 | 8 | 7 | 40 | 18 | 2.22 | |
| Identify XML lead at each agency | 4 | 6 | 8 | 40 | 18 | 2.22 | |
| Review large commercial implementations & int'l eGov efforts | 3 | 11 | 5 | 40 | 19 | 2.11 | |
| Survey federal agencies on XML policies | 6 | 8 | 6 | 40 | 20 | 2.00 | |
| Standard methodology, test procedures & group of test data | 5 | 10 | 5 | 40 | 20 | 2.00 | |
| Create XML schema for gov performance plans & reports | 6 | 8 | 6 | 40 | 20 | 2.00 | |
|
|
|||||||
| Remmendations to AIC for immediate actions (A-11 reporting) | 3 | 9 | 6 | 39 | 18 | 2.17 | |
| Develop central standards recommendations | 3 | 9 | 6 | 39 | 18 | 2.17 | |
| Select 5-10 agency areas for pilot interoperability | 3 | 12 | 4 | 39 | 19 | 2.05 | |
| Register 500 most popular elements using ISO BSR | 4 | 13 | 3 | 39 | 20 | 1.95 | |
| OMB funding for XML work | 4 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 18 | 2.11 | |
| Leverage federal EDI standards into XML | 5 | 9 | 5 | 38 | 19 | 2.00 | |
| Suggest XML as a formal eGov project | 7 | 5 | 7 | 38 | 19 | 2.00 | |
| Build on eGov work (including geospatial) | 4 | 11 | 4 | 38 | 19 | 2.00 | |
| Establish lead agencies by areas of expertise | 9 | 8 | 4 | 37 | 21 | 1.76 | |
| OMB/PMC/Quad Council develop EA & business processes | 4 | 10 | 4 | 36 | 18 | 2.00 | |
| Verbiage on XML for architecture framework model | 5 | 8 | 5 | 36 | 18 | 2.00 | |
| Institutionalized procedures for harmonization & quality | 8 | 5 | 6 | 36 | 19 | 1.89 | |
| Schema for information quality | 7 | 10 | 3 | 36 | 20 | 1.80 | |
| Increase participation in xml.gov site | 3 | 13 | 2 | 35 | 18 | 1.94 | |
| Establish eGov focus (G2C) | 4 | 11 | 3 | 35 | 18 | 1.94 | |
| Synergize with Canada & UK strategic activities | 6 | 10 | 3 | 35 | 19 | 1.84 | |
| Support XML WG as clearinghouse | 7 | 8 | 4 | 35 | 19 | 1.84 | |
| Market xml.gov outreach to agencies | 7 | 6 | 5 | 34 | 18 | 1.89 | |
| Develop hierarchy for XML activities | 10 | 9 | 2 | 34 | 21 | 1.62 | |
| Business area analysis by function (across agencies) | 6 | 6 | 5 | 33 | 17 | 1.94 | |
| Link fed funded research into XML activities | 6 | 9 | 3 | 33 | 18 | 1.83 | |
| Establish agency enterprise interop services layer (business) | 7 | 7 | 4 | 33 | 18 | 1.83 | |
| Establish XML representation of top levels of gov & services | 10 | 4 | 5 | 33 | 19 | 1.74 | |
| Survey federal agencies to identify current work/gap analysis | 8 | 8 | 3 | 33 | 19 | 1.74 | |
| Establish procedures for discovery (G2C use cases) | 10 | 7 | 3 | 33 | 20 | 1.65 | |
| Market research on XML expertise from vendors | 12 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 20 | 1.60 | |
| Conduct survey of State & local governments | 12 | 7 | 2 | 32 | 21 | 1.52 | |
| Survey horizontals & verticals for cross-overs & gaps | 10 | 6 | 3 | 31 | 19 | 1.63 | |
| Determine balance of top-down/bottom-up approach | 12 | 5 | 3 | 31 | 20 | 1.55 | |
| Define standard verbiage for XML registry IP constraints | 7 | 10 | 1 | 30 | 18 | 1.67 | |
| Full-time roles/management for centralized activity | 10 | 4 | 4 | 30 | 18 | 1.67 | |
| XML seal of approval | 13 | 5 | 2 | 29 | 20 | 1.45 | |
| Create OMB budget call letter for overall XML work | 10 | 5 | 2 | 26 | 17 | 1.53 | |
| Create an award for XML (e.g. Baldridge award) | 15 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 19 | 1.32 | |
|
|
|||||||
| Average | 39.5 | 19.4 | 2.03 | ||||